<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Business in Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businessinpolitics.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businessinpolitics.com</link>
	<description>Comment and opinion on politics, economics and the spaces in between</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:12:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tesco could be bad for the health of your local economy by Darren Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.businessinpolitics.com/2011/06/tesco-could-be-bad-for-the-health-of-your-local-economy/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessinpolitics.com/?p=105#comment-45</guid>
		<description>The point is: be it Tesco,Asda,Sainsbury&#039;s,B&amp;Q ect, these giant stores are vacuming up all the local jobs which cost the job sector an estimated 200-300 jobs each time one opens.I reckon it&#039;s much more.Enviromental damage is also a concern,with goods being transported from far away (far east ect)the local communities are devasted,but the governments of all colors are financially backed and supported by these tax avoiding capitalists.A vicious cycle that the poor,sick and unemployed are being blamed for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point is: be it Tesco,Asda,Sainsbury&#8217;s,B&amp;Q ect, these giant stores are vacuming up all the local jobs which cost the job sector an estimated 200-300 jobs each time one opens.I reckon it&#8217;s much more.Enviromental damage is also a concern,with goods being transported from far away (far east ect)the local communities are devasted,but the governments of all colors are financially backed and supported by these tax avoiding capitalists.A vicious cycle that the poor,sick and unemployed are being blamed for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on George Osborne falls short &#8211; the bank firewall is a sham by The Vickers Report is useless and won&#8217;t bring banking reform - Business in Politics &#124; Business in Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.businessinpolitics.com/2011/06/george-osborne-falls-short-the-bank-firewall-is-a-sham/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>The Vickers Report is useless and won&#8217;t bring banking reform - Business in Politics &#124; Business in Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessinpolitics.com/?p=110#comment-26</guid>
		<description>[...] George Osborne falls short &#8211; the bank firewall is a sham [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] George Osborne falls short &#8211; the bank firewall is a sham [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Vickers Report is useless and won&#8217;t bring banking reform by The Vickers Report is Useless and won&#8217;t bring banking reform &#171; Karl Craig-West&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.businessinpolitics.com/2011/09/the-vickers-report-wont-bring-banking-reform/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>The Vickers Report is Useless and won&#8217;t bring banking reform &#171; Karl Craig-West&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessinpolitics.com/?p=202#comment-25</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.businessinpolitics.com/2011/09/the-vickers-report-wont-bring-banking-reform/ Like this:LikeBe the first to like this post.  Tags: banking, business, reform, report, vickers           Navigate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.businessinpolitics.com/2011/09/the-vickers-report-wont-bring-banking-reform/" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessinpolitics.com/2011/09/the-vickers-report-wont-bring-banking-reform/</a> Like this:LikeBe the first to like this post.  Tags: banking, business, reform, report, vickers           Navigate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 ideas for the UK Government to help small businesses by Karl Craig-West</title>
		<link>http://www.businessinpolitics.com/2011/05/5-ideas-for-the-uk-government-to-help-small-businesses/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Craig-West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessinpolitics.com/?p=91#comment-12</guid>
		<description>OK, I&#039;ve thought of a couple more:

6 - Change the insolvency laws so those who legitimately run a business which eventually fails will not lose their home. At present any self-employed person has to incorporate (become a Limited company) to prevent business failure turning into eviction. This puts many people off and increases the paperwork involved in running a small business.

7 - Provide free, but mandatory, training on topics such as book-keeping, principles of tax, and marketing. This won&#039;t stop businesses from failing but it&#039;ll give those with little business experience a chance to avoid common startup mistakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I&#8217;ve thought of a couple more:</p>
<p>6 &#8211; Change the insolvency laws so those who legitimately run a business which eventually fails will not lose their home. At present any self-employed person has to incorporate (become a Limited company) to prevent business failure turning into eviction. This puts many people off and increases the paperwork involved in running a small business.</p>
<p>7 &#8211; Provide free, but mandatory, training on topics such as book-keeping, principles of tax, and marketing. This won&#8217;t stop businesses from failing but it&#8217;ll give those with little business experience a chance to avoid common startup mistakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Revenue down? Bartering is on the up! by Grant</title>
		<link>http://www.businessinpolitics.com/2011/08/revenue-down-bartering-is-on-the-up/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessinpolitics.com/?p=158#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Sometimes there is that. If the people involved have not had too much experience trading, then it can be a lot of work, for not much in return, just like you say. Like anything though, with experience, the trades are likely to get better. 

I&#039;ve spoken to someone that has agreed to design &amp; build a website for me in return for writing, which is easy, as it is a straight swap. Some deals can be complicated, but service provider to service provider deals are usually pretty simple.

Thanks

Grant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes there is that. If the people involved have not had too much experience trading, then it can be a lot of work, for not much in return, just like you say. Like anything though, with experience, the trades are likely to get better. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve spoken to someone that has agreed to design &amp; build a website for me in return for writing, which is easy, as it is a straight swap. Some deals can be complicated, but service provider to service provider deals are usually pretty simple.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Grant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Revenue down? Bartering is on the up! by Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.businessinpolitics.com/2011/08/revenue-down-bartering-is-on-the-up/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 20:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessinpolitics.com/?p=158#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Good point Grant, I&#039;ve used barter a few times in my business and it can be very beneficial (especially when cashflow is tight).

The challenge with it, I found, is finding an equally beneficial exchange. I ended up doing loads of work for a barter deal which cost me more than what I got out of it.

Cheers,
Karl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Grant, I&#8217;ve used barter a few times in my business and it can be very beneficial (especially when cashflow is tight).</p>
<p>The challenge with it, I found, is finding an equally beneficial exchange. I ended up doing loads of work for a barter deal which cost me more than what I got out of it.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Karl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tesco could be bad for the health of your local economy by Karl Craig-West</title>
		<link>http://www.businessinpolitics.com/2011/06/tesco-could-be-bad-for-the-health-of-your-local-economy/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Craig-West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 18:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessinpolitics.com/?p=105#comment-15</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve picked on Tesco because they are often the most visible and aggressive culprit (especially here in Leicester). The issue isn&#039;t really with Tesco specifically since, as you rightly pointed out, there are other candidates. 

The real problem lies with local authorities allowing the supermarket giants to have &#039;Express&#039; stores where the local community is already well served. The local Councils claim it&#039;s about creating jobs but usually money actually flows out of the local community and the jobs creation is a zero sum game against jobs lost in small local businesses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve picked on Tesco because they are often the most visible and aggressive culprit (especially here in Leicester). The issue isn&#8217;t really with Tesco specifically since, as you rightly pointed out, there are other candidates. </p>
<p>The real problem lies with local authorities allowing the supermarket giants to have &#8216;Express&#8217; stores where the local community is already well served. The local Councils claim it&#8217;s about creating jobs but usually money actually flows out of the local community and the jobs creation is a zero sum game against jobs lost in small local businesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tesco could be bad for the health of your local economy by peter saunders</title>
		<link>http://www.businessinpolitics.com/2011/06/tesco-could-be-bad-for-the-health-of-your-local-economy/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>peter saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessinpolitics.com/?p=105#comment-13</guid>
		<description>but on what grounds?

So if tesco, why not sainsbury?

and then what about carphone warehouse?  or a branch of john lewis, or any big store?  I can support other businesses, but local people decide what they buy.  The boundaries seem unclear, and not well defined, as to why just tesco .. on what principle should they be singled out?
I buy from local markets, but that has nothing to do with making Tesco &#039;wrong&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but on what grounds?</p>
<p>So if tesco, why not sainsbury?</p>
<p>and then what about carphone warehouse?  or a branch of john lewis, or any big store?  I can support other businesses, but local people decide what they buy.  The boundaries seem unclear, and not well defined, as to why just tesco .. on what principle should they be singled out?<br />
I buy from local markets, but that has nothing to do with making Tesco &#8216;wrong&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The budget deficit is the fault of the Labour Government and not the bankers by Karl Craig-West</title>
		<link>http://www.businessinpolitics.com/2011/03/the-budget-deficit-is-the-fault-of-the-labour-government-and-not-the-bankers/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Craig-West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessinpolitics.com/?p=42#comment-6</guid>
		<description>The deficit would probably be manageable but still a serious issue. The problem with living on debt is that ultimately it has to be paid back. 

Gordon Brown was borrowing record amounts as far back as early 2005, effectively mortgaging our economic future in an effort to make it look like they were &#039;investing&#039; in public services. However, he was doing this with money he didn&#039;t have and wouldn&#039;t have to pay back during his tenure. Effectively he made decisions that succeeding governments were going to have to fix later. The banking crash merely brought that whole economic fix forward by a few years.

The banking situation was a result of bad policy decisions and so-called &#039;light touch&#039; regulation on banking. What Gordon Brown and Ed Balls ignored was the whole of banking history. They failed to appreciate that if there is room for outrageous speculation in the name of profits then the banks have always acted on the side of greed and taken a mile when an inch was intended. Time and time again the banking industry has proved that it&#039;s incapable of proper self-regulation but policy makers seem quite willing to ignore this fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The deficit would probably be manageable but still a serious issue. The problem with living on debt is that ultimately it has to be paid back. </p>
<p>Gordon Brown was borrowing record amounts as far back as early 2005, effectively mortgaging our economic future in an effort to make it look like they were &#8216;investing&#8217; in public services. However, he was doing this with money he didn&#8217;t have and wouldn&#8217;t have to pay back during his tenure. Effectively he made decisions that succeeding governments were going to have to fix later. The banking crash merely brought that whole economic fix forward by a few years.</p>
<p>The banking situation was a result of bad policy decisions and so-called &#8216;light touch&#8217; regulation on banking. What Gordon Brown and Ed Balls ignored was the whole of banking history. They failed to appreciate that if there is room for outrageous speculation in the name of profits then the banks have always acted on the side of greed and taken a mile when an inch was intended. Time and time again the banking industry has proved that it&#8217;s incapable of proper self-regulation but policy makers seem quite willing to ignore this fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The budget deficit is the fault of the Labour Government and not the bankers by Harry Alffa</title>
		<link>http://www.businessinpolitics.com/2011/03/the-budget-deficit-is-the-fault-of-the-labour-government-and-not-the-bankers/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Alffa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessinpolitics.com/?p=42#comment-5</guid>
		<description>&quot;as a result of having to prop up several banks, the deficit suddenly became a very hot topic indeed&quot;.
So if it wasn&#039;t for the banks the deficit wouldn&#039;t be a problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;as a result of having to prop up several banks, the deficit suddenly became a very hot topic indeed&#8221;.<br />
So if it wasn&#8217;t for the banks the deficit wouldn&#8217;t be a problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

